Valve could’ve been successful just doing Half-Life

This article is over 10 years old and may contain outdated information

‘In retrospect, [Steam] was a great idea, right?’

Recommended Videos

In an interview with The Washington Post, Valve co-founder Gabe Newell described the company’s inner workings which have been the topic of discussion time and time again. Did you know, for instance, vacation time isn’t tracked? And for those who have wondered why Half-Life 3 hasn’t happened yet, a few quotes bring the point home.

“When we started out we were a single-player video game company that could have been really successful just doing Half-Life sequel after Half-Life sequel,” explained Newell, “but we collectively said let’s try to make multiplayer games even though there’s never been a commercial successful multiplayer game … Then we tried to do Steam.”

Elsewhere in the interview, he talks about how “specialization in gaming is sort of the enemy of the future,” noting “…being really good at Half-Life level design is not as nearly as valued as thinking of how to design social multiplayer experiences.”

While Valve undoubtedly has the money to bring that long-awaited next installment to market if it so desired, collectively, that’s not been a priority for employees. I can’t say I blame them, either. Not with the success of Steam, Team Fortress 2, and Dota 2. Newell is thinking much more long-term than a single game, even if it is a game we desperately want.

Gabe Newell on what makes Valve tick [The Washington Post]


Destructoid is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jordan Devore
Jordan Devore
Jordan is a founding member of Destructoid and poster of seemingly random pictures. They are anything but random.