Terrible Females: Video games’ Forever Girls

You’re no Sidney Prescott

Recommended Videos

Itā€™s finally cold in New York, leaves have turned a late orange, and gloomy October feels much farther than the promise of chilly, cheerful (depending on how much you like your family) December. Weā€™re slowly fading into the next year, but although Halloween is well behind us, I find playing horror video games to have year-round pertinence. Case in point, I just started replaying Bloodborne for the millionth time. Its grey skies and black clothing feel fitting for this time of year, when the sun sets at 5 p.m. and you head home early to avoid the cold.

This will be the final column under my Terrible Females theme, and, as perhaps you have gleaned from my introduction about the enduring nature of horror, Iā€™ve been thinking about one element of horror games that truly sticks around: women, if you can even believe it.

[Source: Wallpaper Access]
At one point or another, youā€™ve probably heard of the ā€œFinal Girl,ā€ a term first used by American film professor Carol Clover in her 1987 journal article ā€œHer Body, Himself: Gender in the Slasher Film.ā€ In the article, Clover characterizes the Final Girl as ā€œthe survivor,ā€ a woman who ā€œis boyishā€ in her ā€œsmartness, gravity, competence […], and sexual reluctance,ā€ and cites Halloweenā€™s Laurie and Alienā€™s Ripley as prime examples.

Horror movies have started to progress past the stereotypical Final Girl and onto a Final Girl who is more openly sexual and feminine (Cam, Midsommar, and Ready or NotĀ are some newer examples), but the traditional Final Girl still heavily defines the genre (A Quiet Place, Till Death, and CandymanĀ are recent examples of its enduring influence!). Horror games, however, have managed to avoid the trope for most of its history.

Going back to Bloodborne, non-playable characters like The Doll, Yharnam, Pthumerian Queen, and Arianna are all sexual or visually feminine characters, and yet are all allowed to live (depending on how you play the game) until the end. Unlike women characters in horror movies, these characters arenā€™t punished for their sexuality or their open expression of womanhood. Theyā€™re presented adorned with bows, in dresses, or, more grotesquely in the Pthumerian Queen and Ariannaā€™s case, bleeding or battered from childbirth. As players, we accept this womanly presentation at face value. During a horror movie, you might spot the promiscuous, dress-wearing woman early and tell yourself sheā€™s going to die. But womanhood in a horror game is too active for that.

That doesnā€™t mean, though, that horror video games never indulge themselves in the stereotypical “strong” woman character. When you scroll through photos of famous woman horror game protagonists (especially in survival games, the video game equivalent of Final Girl-heavy slasher films) you see a lot of ponytails, short hair, and generally modest clothing.

[Source: CNET]
This suggests that developers share at least one opinion with many horror directors ā€” if sheā€™s virginal, she definitely gets to live. Even so, these game protagonists are usually not the only women left alive at the end, and audiences get a wider range of characters than just the virgin, the whore, and the mean girl that horror movies tend to go for. Although the two mediums unfortunately approach typecasting women similarly, games still avoid taking the plot and characterization shortcut that is the Final Girl.

When video games do focus on a single woman character, she tends to be a subversion of the typical Final Girl. These characters, like Juliet from Lollipop Chainsaw and Aya from Parasite Eve,Ā may beĀ partially borne from video gamesā€™ penchant for hypersexual women. But horror movies rarely give us this kind of character outside ofĀ Jenniferā€™s Body, so it can be nice to see.

[Source: Twitter]
Although video gamesā€™ Forever Girls are certainly a welcome contrast to filmā€™s Final Girls, it is somewhat disconcerting that horror feels like the only genre where women in video games are allowed to thrive. People have discussed why this is before, often noting that video games position women as weak and more prone to horror, or as an interesting comment in a 2016 Reddit thread said, players might not expect a female protagonist to survive, making them invested in her story, whereas they would anticipate that a male protagonist ā€œfight back and be a hero.ā€

Personally, I think that video gamesā€™ Forever Girls exist because, unlike movies, which necessitate a passive audience, video games anticipate an active, and often even aggressive, audience. Instead of delighting in watching a killer slice open girls one by one the way a movie-goer would, a video game player is most satisfied in making their own choice ā€” will they kill the girl themselves? Will they help her? Will they die instead?

So, video gamesā€™ Forever Girls arenā€™t totally immune to the same misogyny that created filmā€™s Final Girls, and, outside of that, it would be nice to see video games diversify their female characters, especially in terms of personality, looks, and race. In any case, it’s worth noticing the way women heavily populate the horror genre, and Iā€™d be interested to hear your thoughts on that in the comments. Nothing scarier than female domination!

[More articles in the ā€œTerrible Femalesā€ series: Anatomy of a woman monster, Against the damsel in distress, When you’re a girl, you get used to blood.]


Destructoid is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Ashley Bardhan
Ashley Bardhan
Ashley Bardhan is a writer from New York. She thinks about Bloodborne a lot.