Yep, I've said it. Having per-ordered Battlefield BC2 on Steam gave me the option to join the ongoing multiplayer beta. I found that the sole map included in BC2's multiplayer beta is much more enjoyable than Modern Warfare 2's multiplayer counterpart, and here are the reasons, ten of 'em.

1- Dedicated servers: No lousy matchmaking system that bugs.

2- No killstreak bonuses: Getting rammed with two harriers plus a chopper gunner or an AC130 isn't fun. I gotta admit that when you are in control of these four things, it's fun :P But you get tags and medals in BC2 for kill streaks.

3- Maps are huge: And they get bigger as you complete objectives. You can play up to 32 people on the same server, which is another plus. Think of it like number 3.5

4- No campers can win: If you camp in BC2, you will most likely lose. (I define camping as people camping when it's not their objective. I.E: You defend M-COM stations in BC2, you are not camping, you are doing your objective, which is to defend the damn stations.)

5- Guns have recoil: You can't spray and be effective in BC2. I ended up killing the sky many times with my assault rifle until I decided to burst.

6- Knives can't be your main weapon: The knife in BC2 is strong, even as strong as MW2's, but you can telewarp to knife and you must be spot on to effectively knife kill. Most of the time, taking a step back and blasting the dude to hell is a smarter decision.

7- Tanks, planes, helicopters, ATVs...: And they aren't overkill machine a la Battlefield 2, where a dude could rape you and your whole family with only one plane. Most of the time, teams have a lot of option to take out these vehicle quickly. I have yet to play a round where we get hammered by one tank, or one helicopter.

8- No perks: You gotta have skill, or else prepare to die a lot.

9- Gravity drop on bullets: Make sniping extra fun and extra rewarding when you headshot a dude from hella far because you aimed an inch higher to compensate the drop. It is also much more realistic... which is my last point.

10- The game is much more realistic: It's a battlefield, plain and simple. You get infantry, vehicle, tanks, and a lot of death. No fancy whatever.

Both games are good, I can't write otherwise. These was my ten reasons why I think that Battlefield Bad Company 2 will be slightly better when It launch this march.

If you played both, just tell me what you think about those two games.

The site said "all it need now is a noob"

I've played the game a lot, been here, done that. I think I played every single mode there is on this game at least 10 times. And I hate grenade launchers.

I understand we need 20 kills to get the masterkey shotgun under the barrel, but enough is enough! That thing can rip you apart in normal games. It is so powerful that some people it as their main weapon, with the scavenger perk. This is ridiculous, how in hell can a firearm accessory become more important than the main weapon!

I've seen people going 50 and 2 with only the grenade launcher. How can they be proud of that! I use the tube only for the challenges, and I feel dirty and coward. Where is the feeling that you owned the guy with bullets!

Oh and they give you the danger close perk which make the tube even more powerful. The same thing, twice the shit.

Hardcore players get killed at the start of the round if the fucker can shoot at the right place, and usually they do.

I have a dream. A dream of noob and skilled player like me sitting at the same table of friendship and prosperity.
I have a dream. A dream of fun games without grenades launchers, because quite frankly they don't belong in online games.

I hate grenade launchers.

Hurray me, first post on destructoid.



No seriously, I just wonder why, sometimes, people get paid to do pretty bad games... or even if these people think that they did an awesome job on this game or that game. And don't tell me "not all devs are big, well funded game devs." to that, I call B.S. only because indie gaming has proved me that even the smallest game company can do the best games (Chains, most of the Pixeljunk stuff, Audiosurf, Braid and the list goes on...).

It bring me to the reason why I have decided to share with you guys my hatred towards bad games, the game you should buy and set on fire to save innocent lives. And that game is Rogue Warrior.



The game suuuuuuuck... hard. It fails so hard that you most likely laugh instead of any emotion / feeling the game dev intended. Rebellion is the father of this abomination, and Bethesda Softworks helped spread the plague.

I have played this game with a friend, it gave us a good laugh, but at one point in the game, usually after 5 mins in the first level, you become tired of the "fucks" you keep hearing, which, by the way, is the only good point of this gaming gonhorrea. The controls are unresponsive, the cover system is flawed, the A.I. is between the I.Q of a chair and the usefullness of a snuggie, the game suck, the main character is named Dick, a badass, who should be de-badass'd by now, oh and did I tell you that the game suck?

I mean the game is really bad, really really bad, but still better than Ultraviolet. (That movie was really horrible by the way, and I think it's the only "really bad" movie that is not from Uwe Boll)

It metascore is 30, on the Xbox360, because It got only 29 on both the PC and the PS3.

They used to say "Save a tree, burn a book" in Postal 2. I'd say "Save a geek, burn a Rogue Warrior".

You people better not comment on saying that you love that game. You're lying.

People that honestly love this game deserve a roundhouse kick in the throat. Or a psychiatrist. Or both.